NFL Mock Draft sees three Tigers among the top prospects

Matt Miller keeps three Clemson defenders in his Top 50: Peter Woods at No. 10, Avieon Terrell No. 27, and T.J. Parker No. 29.
2024 ACC Football Championship - Clemson v SMU
2024 ACC Football Championship - Clemson v SMU | Grant Halverson/GettyImages

Clemson’s season may be headed toward its final chapter in New York, but the next one for three Tigers defenders is already taking shape in NFL ink.

In Matt Miller’s updated Top 50 prospects, Peter Woods, Avieon Terrell and T.J. Parker all remain firmly in the conversation — a snapshot that doubles as both validation and warning: Clemson still has Sunday-level talent, and it’s concentrated in the places that can flip games fast.

Peter Woods is the headliner — and the prototype

Woods checks in as Clemson’s highest-rated player at No. 10 overall, with Miller framing him as the top interior defensive lineman on the board because of what the NFL pays for most: disruption.

“Woods is a 3-technique defensive tackle with the quickness to be an immediate pocket disruptor in the NFL,” Miller said, pointing to the first-step advantage that turns protection plans into chaos. “He gets double-teamed a lot because offensive linemen struggle to match his first step in one-on-one situations.”

The production notes are there, too — and so is the context of why teams will still buy in.

“Woods has the strength to counter that, accumulating five career sacks and 42 hurries despite the extra attention,” Miller said. “Though his lack of sack production could limit his upside for some teams, Woods’ position-specific traits are good enough to make him a top-10 pick.”

Avieon Terrell’s rise is built on impact plays, not measurements

At No. 27, Terrell’s ranking reads like a modern NFL job description: versatile, sudden, productive, and dangerous around the ball — even if he isn’t the classic outside press corner.

“Avieon Terrell is a sudden and versatile player who can make an impact in the slot or out wide,” Miller said. “He has elite ball production, with three sacks and five forced fumbles this season and 21 pass breakups dating to 2024.”

And while Miller flags the size conversation, he also gives the counter that matters: how Terrell wins.

“Despite lacking elite size, Terrell undercuts routes well and has the closing speed to impact the ball in the air,” Miller said. “He’s not an outside press corner but has the quickness to excel as a nickel or slot defender.”

T.J. Parker’s stock cooled — but the traits didn’t disappear

Parker lands at No. 29, and the evaluation comes with the honesty scouts respect: the 2025 sack totals didn’t match the 2024 hype — but the tape still flashes.

“Parker reemerged after a three-sack performance in the season finale against South Carolina, but his stock has tailed off after he registered 11 sacks in 2024,” Miller said. “He seemed primed for a top-10 ranking then, and though that hasn’t held up, he still flashes high-end potential and traits.”

Miller’s projection leans into what translates: power, hands, and edge-setting.

“Parker has the power and heavy hands to be an effective 4-3 defensive end and can consistently beat double-teams to set the edge in run defense,” Miller said, while noting, “There are questions about his arm length that will play out in the predraft process.”

What it means for Clemson — and for the draft cycle

Three defenders in a Top 50 isn’t just a brag. It’s a reminder of where Clemson can still dictate terms: interior disruption, secondary havoc, and edge power. And as the pre-draft process shifts from rankings to measurable proof — all-star settings, testing, interviews — each of these guys has a clear question to answer:

  • Woods: can the sack numbers catch up to the chaos?
  • Terrell: can teams agree on his best NFL home — outside or inside?
  • Parker: can he turn traits back into weekly production?

For Clemson, it’s the same old story — just told in a new way: the Tigers are still sending defenders who don’t need perfect conditions to change a game.

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations