Clemson’s late portal push says less about desperation and more about adaptation

Clemson’s interest in Tennessee transfer Caleb Herring reflects a subtle shift in how the Tigers are building defensive depth in the portal era.
COLLEGE FOOTBALL: NOV 08 Florida State at Clemson
COLLEGE FOOTBALL: NOV 08 Florida State at Clemson | Icon Sportswire/GettyImages

Clemson’s pursuit of former Tennessee edge rusher Caleb Herring isn’t a last-minute scramble. It’s a signal.

For years, the Clemson Tigers built dominant defenses the same way: identify elite high school talent, develop patiently, trust continuity. That model still matters. But the Tigers’ late-window portal interest along the edge shows a program adjusting to modern roster math without abandoning its identity.

Edge defense is where that math gets unforgiving. Injuries happen. Roles specialize. Offenses stress space. Depth that looks sufficient in August can evaporate by October. Clemson’s interest in Herring is less about chasing sack totals and more about insulating the room with experience and versatility.

Herring’s production at Tennessee Volunteers won’t wow on its own. Five sacks across three seasons won’t move a market. But traits still matter more than stats at this position. Length. Lateral mobility. The ability to rush, drop and close in space. Those tools translate across schemes—and they age well.

That’s the quiet pivot. Clemson isn’t using the portal to replace development; it’s using it to protect it.

Young edge players benefit from competition that doesn’t force them onto the field before they’re ready. Veterans benefit from rotations that keep legs fresh. Coaches benefit from flexibility when offenses spread the field and hunt matchups. Portal additions like Herring raise the floor without capping the ceiling.

There’s also a broader context. Clemson passed on Herring out of high school. That’s not hypocrisy; it’s reality. Evaluations evolve. Players mature. The portal exists because first judgments are no longer final. Pretending otherwise is how depth issues become systemic problems.

This approach reflects a pragmatic version of leadership from coach Dabo Swinney—one that blends principle with adaptation. Clemson isn’t chasing trends. It’s selecting moments.

If the Tigers land Herring, it won’t dominate headlines in January. But it may explain defensive steadiness in November, when rotation strength matters more than recruiting stars.

That’s not a philosophical overhaul.

It’s Clemson acknowledging that in today’s game, smart depth is as valuable as star power.

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations